<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican Debate Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jenngrover.com/2008/01/31/republican-debate-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jenngrover.com/2008/01/31/republican-debate-recap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 18:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2008/01/31/republican-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=242#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m anxious to see how Mike does on Super Tuesday.  I think he&#039;ll do better than many of the pundints seem to believe.  I don&#039;t, however, believe he&#039;ll take a big prize like California.  Remember this, though...California has 53 delegates available.  Mike could (and probably will) lose the popular vote throughout the state, but could still pick up several delegates in CA while also doing well in the South.  It&#039;s the Southwest and Mountain states that I see as trouble for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m anxious to see how Mike does on Super Tuesday.  I think he&#8217;ll do better than many of the pundints seem to believe.  I don&#8217;t, however, believe he&#8217;ll take a big prize like California.  Remember this, though&#8230;California has 53 delegates available.  Mike could (and probably will) lose the popular vote throughout the state, but could still pick up several delegates in CA while also doing well in the South.  It&#8217;s the Southwest and Mountain states that I see as trouble for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2008/01/31/republican-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=242#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Let me restate my previous thoughts on Mitt Romney.  I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances in 2008.  He has been untruthful repeatedly.  I would prefer someone with more moderate values to someone who has been dishonest.

Secondly, don&#039;t count Mike out yet.  He had a strong debate performance and will take a number if not all of the southern and border states on Super Tuesday.  This thing is not a done deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me restate my previous thoughts on Mitt Romney.  I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances in 2008.  He has been untruthful repeatedly.  I would prefer someone with more moderate values to someone who has been dishonest.</p>
<p>Secondly, don&#8217;t count Mike out yet.  He had a strong debate performance and will take a number if not all of the southern and border states on Super Tuesday.  This thing is not a done deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2008/01/31/republican-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=242#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Social Conservatives Unite! 
Now is the time. If you believe in a Constitutional Amendment to preserve traditional marriage. If you believe in appointing judges who believe the Constitution is a document, not some living organism. If you believe groups trying to elect candidates who share our values should be allowed to spend our contributions on political ads. If you believe life should be protected. Now is the time to support Mitt Romney.

I want to speak particularly Mike Huckabee supporters. A vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain. If you fracture the conservative vote, McCain will win by default.

Remember this is the guy who attacked members of the religious right as being agents of intolerance. That is what he does when you are against him. He believes that about religious groups that challenge him. That is why he liked McCain-Feingold. As previously stated here, this is the guy who has problems appointing conservative judges. You don&#039;t want him as President.

While I&#039;m at it, remember that just because McCain says he is the most electable, doesn&#039;t mean he is. His predictions have proven false before:

&quot;Unfortunately, Governor Bush is a Pat Robertson Republican who will lose to Al Gore.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Conservatives Unite!<br />
Now is the time. If you believe in a Constitutional Amendment to preserve traditional marriage. If you believe in appointing judges who believe the Constitution is a document, not some living organism. If you believe groups trying to elect candidates who share our values should be allowed to spend our contributions on political ads. If you believe life should be protected. Now is the time to support Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>I want to speak particularly Mike Huckabee supporters. A vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain. If you fracture the conservative vote, McCain will win by default.</p>
<p>Remember this is the guy who attacked members of the religious right as being agents of intolerance. That is what he does when you are against him. He believes that about religious groups that challenge him. That is why he liked McCain-Feingold. As previously stated here, this is the guy who has problems appointing conservative judges. You don&#8217;t want him as President.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m at it, remember that just because McCain says he is the most electable, doesn&#8217;t mean he is. His predictions have proven false before:</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, Governor Bush is a Pat Robertson Republican who will lose to Al Gore.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2008/01/31/republican-debate-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=242#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Please Mike drop out of the race.  I supported you from the beginning, I share your values.  At this point I&#039;m sad to say you have no chance to win.  Please don&#039;t hand this to McCain by staying in the race.  At least we would have Governor to run for the party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Mike drop out of the race.  I supported you from the beginning, I share your values.  At this point I&#8217;m sad to say you have no chance to win.  Please don&#8217;t hand this to McCain by staying in the race.  At least we would have Governor to run for the party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

