<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye Ma Bell, Hello Google Voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jenngrover.com/2009/03/13/goodbye-ma-bell-hello-google-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jenngrover.com/2009/03/13/goodbye-ma-bell-hello-google-voice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 18:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Calvetti</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2009/03/13/goodbye-ma-bell-hello-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Calvetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=1363#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>With the way Google has been with developing apps, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they released an app for Android or iPhone.  Here&#039;s my thought:  Let&#039;s say they release an iPhone app.  If the rumors of free internet from old TV space is true, you could buy an iPod touch for a flat fee, then use the Voice app as the phone.  Voila, a free-service phone.

I know it&#039;d be more complicated than that, but still I can dream.  And I&#039;m sure there are other wi-fi enabled devices that could use this- netbooks especially- but an iPod would be a nice size...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the way Google has been with developing apps, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they released an app for Android or iPhone.  Here&#8217;s my thought:  Let&#8217;s say they release an iPhone app.  If the rumors of free internet from old TV space is true, you could buy an iPod touch for a flat fee, then use the Voice app as the phone.  Voila, a free-service phone.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;d be more complicated than that, but still I can dream.  And I&#8217;m sure there are other wi-fi enabled devices that could use this- netbooks especially- but an iPod would be a nice size&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Daley</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2009/03/13/goodbye-ma-bell-hello-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=1363#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>I used grandcentral for a while, I have a very low tolerance for dropped calls and static, and so ended up not using it.  Google bought grandcentral a long time ago (2 years?), and closed registration and never did anything with it, so I figured it was dead.  They&#039;ve had a &quot;coming soon&quot; message on their page for a long time.

It is VOIP - I&#039;m not sure why you are hesitating calling it that?

I now run my own VOIP server (using VOIP wholesalers, and bypassing the residential services), and I am finally happy with VOIP - I have tried a VOIP service once or twice a year for the last four or five years, and been disappointed each time.  It seems to me that people&#039;s expectations of phone quality has gotten lower, and people are so used to having issues that they assume it is their phone, and not the other guy.  I think people have forgotten what phones were like 20 years ago - no static, no dropped calls, no non-completed calls.

Our bills are a little hard to track now, since we deposit $50 into the phone company every once in a while, but I think our monthly costs are somewhere on the order of $12/month, including all long distance and international calling.  $5 for the incoming dial-tone, and $.02/minute to landlines in most industrialized countries.  And I get all sorts of cool features, since I can program anything in Asterisk&#039;s programming language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used grandcentral for a while, I have a very low tolerance for dropped calls and static, and so ended up not using it.  Google bought grandcentral a long time ago (2 years?), and closed registration and never did anything with it, so I figured it was dead.  They&#8217;ve had a &#8220;coming soon&#8221; message on their page for a long time.</p>
<p>It is VOIP &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure why you are hesitating calling it that?</p>
<p>I now run my own VOIP server (using VOIP wholesalers, and bypassing the residential services), and I am finally happy with VOIP &#8211; I have tried a VOIP service once or twice a year for the last four or five years, and been disappointed each time.  It seems to me that people&#8217;s expectations of phone quality has gotten lower, and people are so used to having issues that they assume it is their phone, and not the other guy.  I think people have forgotten what phones were like 20 years ago &#8211; no static, no dropped calls, no non-completed calls.</p>
<p>Our bills are a little hard to track now, since we deposit $50 into the phone company every once in a while, but I think our monthly costs are somewhere on the order of $12/month, including all long distance and international calling.  $5 for the incoming dial-tone, and $.02/minute to landlines in most industrialized countries.  And I get all sorts of cool features, since I can program anything in Asterisk&#8217;s programming language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2009/03/13/goodbye-ma-bell-hello-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=1363#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>I am not sure, I haven&#039;t bothered to look at Grand Central.  My best guess is that Google is going to re-use Grand Central&#039;s platform and &quot;Googlize&#039; it.  I just hope it is better than Android and some of the other stuff Google has put out recently.  Evidently there are a few bugs, but nothing that looked like a show-stopper to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure, I haven&#8217;t bothered to look at Grand Central.  My best guess is that Google is going to re-use Grand Central&#8217;s platform and &#8220;Googlize&#8217; it.  I just hope it is better than Android and some of the other stuff Google has put out recently.  Evidently there are a few bugs, but nothing that looked like a show-stopper to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Calvetti</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2009/03/13/goodbye-ma-bell-hello-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Calvetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=1363#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>Huh.  Looks interesting.  I&#039;d be curious as to how it will truly work, as I don&#039;t fully understand GrandCentral.  Is it basically an extension of the previous service, or is it completely different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  Looks interesting.  I&#8217;d be curious as to how it will truly work, as I don&#8217;t fully understand GrandCentral.  Is it basically an extension of the previous service, or is it completely different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

