<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jenn Grover &#187; debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jenngrover.com/tag/debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jenngrover.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My thoughts on posting comments to on a blog</title>
		<link>http://jenngrover.com/2007/12/my-thoughts-on-posting-comments-to-on-a-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://jenngrover.com/2007/12/my-thoughts-on-posting-comments-to-on-a-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenngrover.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Latin phrase &#8220;non sequitur&#8221; means, it does not follow. That is what I have noticed about most comments posted on blogs in general, but especially political blogs these days. Over the last month, I have been amazed (and annoyed) at the types of comments people post on blogs. I find more often than not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Latin phrase &#8220;non sequitur&#8221; means, it does not follow. That is what I have noticed about most comments posted on blogs in general, but especially political blogs these days. Over the last month, I have been amazed (and annoyed) at the types of comments people post on blogs. I find more often than not people are using the comments section of a blog to reflect their own agenda rather than comment on the post itself. For example, I have a post refuting Dr. Wayne Grudem&#8217;s endorsement of Mitt Romney. Many of the comments (before my was deleted and re-launched) were attacks on me for questioning the logic of the Mormon religion and one comment was simply urging readers to go visit Hillary&#8217;s website. None of those comments addressed the true topic of the post. It isn&#8217;t just my blog, it is almost every blog you read. And it is more often the case when the comments are negative.</p>
<p>It seems that people do not know how to appropriately discuss opposing points of view rationally or civilly. It can be difficult, I will grant that. More importantly, it usually takes some time and research to craft a rational, civil argument. I think it is partly because American schools do not teach people how to &#8220;argue&#8221;. By argue, I don&#8217;t mean a rash, haste, disagreement marked by anger. By argue I mean present a different point of view as in a formal debate (not the presidential debates – they don&#8217;t qualify) or as in a court of law.</p>
<p>If people want a forum for airing their opinions, there are plenty of options for a free blog out there. Next time you post a comment to the blog – make sure it is relevant to the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jenngrover.com/2007/12/my-thoughts-on-posting-comments-to-on-a-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

